1. What is your take on the Harm Principle?
2. Do you think it would be beneficial for society if the Harm Principle was indeed constitutionalized how Baker proposes?
3. What are some negative results or consequences that can come out of the Harm Principle being put into place in our criminal justice system?
4. What is your overall take on drugs and their current criminal consequences and punishments?
5. Do you find any positive outcomes from decriminilizing drug use and possession?
6. How is philosophy based writing different from other different genres of writing?
7. What is the purpose of Philosophical articles such as these two since they are basically proposals of things that should be done?
8. Do philosophical ideas such as the ones brought up in these articles ever come to live or are philosophers usually not take as serious?
I like how you balanced out questions about the writings of the philosophy discipline as well as the philosophical content itself. However, I would suggest more questions about the writing techniques itself. Also, take a look at our classmate's questions, there are very interesting ones!
ReplyDelete